Author Topic: MR 500  (Read 13102 times)

Offline whoosh

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 13
Re: MR 500
« Reply #30 on: March 10, 2008, 14:22 »
lanes 3 4 5 better? perhaps... but its a reservoir wif no bumboats around leh... anyway good lanes are useless if the teams are not of a certain standard. rite?

Offline boatingkid

  • Amateur
  • **
  • Posts: 164
  • TREY.....!
Re: MR 500
« Reply #31 on: March 10, 2008, 14:25 »
NTU smashed MR 500.  :P
the over rated team got Bronze for both Men's open and tertiary.
but one thing that makes me wonder.
i thought, for the tertiary finals, SP was third?
what happened?
i went to check the scoreboard for a second time and realised RP's position got shifted to behind SP.
the timing was still the same though.
 ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???
one more thing.
NYJC did really well too.


KUDOS TO NTU!
 :D ;D :D ;D :D ;D

Offline Blade

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 69
Re: MR 500
« Reply #32 on: March 10, 2008, 14:30 »
yes i myself too believe that there was an error there but no point speculating further i suppose. results are out, medals have been awarded.  :-\ :-\

Offline crimson

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 40
Re: MR 500
« Reply #33 on: March 10, 2008, 16:42 »
lanes 3 4 5 better? perhaps... but its a reservoir wif no bumboats around leh... anyway good lanes are useless if the teams are not of a certain standard. rite?

I don't know which teams were in what lane.

but lane 1 is closest to the shore and hence is shallower waters than lane 5= more water resistance against forward motion/turbulence? Sec 4 geography which I forgetten :P

Offline hut hut hut!!

  • Amateur
  • **
  • Posts: 111
Re: MR 500
« Reply #34 on: March 10, 2008, 19:01 »
-
« Last Edit: June 24, 2010, 16:13 by hut hut hut!! »

Offline merman

  • Amateur
  • **
  • Posts: 145
Re: MR 500
« Reply #35 on: March 17, 2008, 09:39 »
NUS lost due to getting off the starting line slow, but they did manage to chase from 1.5 boat length to 3/4 boat length at the end. It is one of those starting conditions problem...